keyso_get_tools_dictionary_ext_by_page_uid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description is the only source of behavioral information. It provides the method and path but no details on authentication requirements, response format, or whether the operation is asynchronous (e.g., polling a state endpoint). It does not disclose any side effects (GET implies none) but also does not explain what the report contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very brief—two lines plus an example. It is front-loaded with the purpose and includes a concrete example, which is efficient. However, it could be better structured with clear separation of sections.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no output schema and no annotations, the description is incomplete. It does not explain that this likely retrieves the result of an async job created via keyso_post_tools_dictionary_ext_by_page, nor does it describe the response content or any error conditions. An agent would not know when this report is ready to be fetched.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already provides descriptions for all four parameters (coverage 100%), and the description does not add any additional semantics. The example URL shows 'base' as a query parameter but does not explain its meaning beyond the schema's 'in: query'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it is a 'dictionary extension by page - report' and provides the HTTP method and path. It is clear this is a GET endpoint for a report, but it does not explicitly say it retrieves results of a previously submitted task or what data the report contains, and it does not differentiate from similar dictionary tools like keyso_get_tools_dictionary_by_pages_uid.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool. It does not mention that it is the GET counterpart to the POST tool for creating the report, nor does it advise when to use this versus other report retrieval endpoints. The agent is left to infer the relationship from the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.