delete_note
Delete a note record from Little Green Light by providing the note ID.
Instructions
Delete a note record by Note ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Delete a note record from Little Green Light by providing the note ID.
Delete a note record by Note ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide destructiveHint=true, so the agent knows it destroys data. The description adds no extra behavioral context (e.g., permanence, permissions). No contradiction with annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no extraneous information. Front-loaded with verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate. Could mention if the delete is soft or permanent, but not strictly necessary given annotations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
While the schema has 0% coverage, the description adds meaning by specifying that 'id' is the 'Note ID', clarifying the parameter's role beyond just a number.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete), the resource (note record), and the identifier (by Note ID). It distinguishes from sibling delete tools for other entities.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of when to delete versus update or other operations, nor any prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/WillHeadlee/Little-Green-Light-MCP-Server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server