Skip to main content
Glama
WillHeadlee

Little Green Light MCP Server

by WillHeadlee

Related Servers

Alternatives to Little Green Light MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to access and manage CiviCRM data, including contacts, activities, contributions, events, and memberships, with full custom field support.
      5
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to query business databases directly via natural language, with enforced read-only access and secure query limits. Supports SQLite and PostgreSQL, and works with any OpenAI-compatible model.
      0
      ISC
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to directly query and manage Autotask PSA data through natural language, including ticket triage, time entry creation, company lookups, project management, billing review, and more.
      Apache 2.0
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with secure access to Salesforce data and operations, enabling natural language interaction with CRM for sales, marketing, and executive teams.
      6
      5
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to securely interact with Fireberry CRM, allowing metadata exploration, schema management, and record operations through natural language.
      30 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants like Claude, ChatGPT, and Copilot to query live Jobber data—clients, jobs, quotes, invoices, revenue, and schedule—using natural language, with read-only access and careful API budget management.
      1
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 148 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    The overwhelming majority of tools use a clear entity+action pattern, so a CRUD tool for gifts, appeals, notes, etc. is easy to distinguish. The main friction points are the two invitation-creation tools (create_constituent_invitation vs create_event_invitation) and the cluster of constituent search/donor-lookup/report tools that overlap in audience even if their descriptions are careful.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools consistently follow verb_noun snake_case (list_, get_, create_, update_, delete_, search_). Deviations such as record_gift, recent_donors/lapsed_donors/top_donors, add_constituent_to_group, and constituents_missing_info break the pattern but remain understandable.

    Tool Count1/5

    At 148 tools this is an extreme surface for an MCP server, far beyond the 25+ threshold, and will create significant context overhead and selection difficulty. The broad entity coverage explains some of the size, but the toolset would be more usable split across focused servers or substantially consolidated.

    Completeness5/5

    The server covers full CRUD/lifecycle workflows for constituents, contact methods, gifts, campaigns, funds, events, appeals, notes, relationships, groups, memberships, volunteer time, class affiliations, and invitations, plus specialized donor analytics and review-queue submissions. The raw call_lgl_api passthrough also closes any remaining endpoint gaps, so there are no obvious dead ends.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues