create_appeal
Create a new fundraising appeal in your Little Green Light CRM with a required name and optional description.
Instructions
Create a new appeal
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| description | No |
Create a new fundraising appeal in your Little Green Light CRM with a required name and optional description.
Create a new appeal
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| name | Yes | ||
| description | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate it's a write operation. Description adds no behavioral details beyond the verb 'create'. OpenWorldHint is not explained. No mention of return value or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence is concise but lacks structure. No additional explanations or examples. It's acceptable but minimal.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the number of sibling tools and lack of output schema, the description is too brief. It does not clarify what an 'appeal' is or what happens after creation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the tool description does not explain any parameter. The agent has no guidance on what values to provide for name and description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool creates a new appeal, using a verb+resource structure. It distinguishes from sibling tools like update_appeal and create_appeal_request.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No information about when to use this tool compared to alternatives like create_appeal_request or update_appeal. No prerequisites or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/WillHeadlee/Little-Green-Light-MCP-Server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server