create_web_address

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false (write operation) but destructiveHint=false. The description merely states 'Add' without detailing behavioral traits such as whether duplicate URLs are allowed, if the tool overwrites existing addresses, or any side effects. Given the annotations provide minimal context, the description should add more behavioral transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence with no unnecessary words. However, it lacks structure such as bullet points or distinct sections, which could improve readability without adding much length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is minimal and omits important context like validation rules, duplicate handling, or the impact on existing web addresses. Given no output schema and limited annotations, the description should provide more completeness for a creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 67% (2 of 3 params described). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema; it does not explain the 'constituent_id' parameter or clarify the 'web_address_type' values. Since coverage is not high, the description should compensate but does not.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Add a web address to a constituent' clearly states the action (Add) and the resource (web address to a constituent). It effectively distinguishes this creation tool from sibling tools like update_web_address, delete_web_address, and list_web_addresses.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not specify when to create a new web address versus updating an existing one, or any prerequisites such as whether the constituent must already exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.