Set quota properties

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false, idempotentHint=false, destructiveHint=false. The description adds that it updates properties and clarifies authentication, but does not disclose potential side effects, error conditions, or behavior if quota_id is invalid. Beyond annotations, it adds moderate context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise: two short sentences plus a note about authentication. Every sentence adds value, and the essential information is front-loaded. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that an output schema exists (context indicates 'Has output schema: true'), the description does not need to detail return values. The description covers the core action, authentication, and the inputs are well-documented by the schema. Missing elements like examples or property name hints are minor given the schema coverage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% for all 3 parameters. The description briefly mentions 'Quota properties to update' for the 'data' parameter, but this adds little beyond the schema. The description does not enhance understanding of the parameters beyond the provided schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update quota properties', using a specific verb (update) and resource (quota properties). It distinguishes itself from siblings like get_quota_properties, add_quota, delete_quota, and list_quotas with no ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions authentication method ('do not provide a session key') and the underlying API method, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., when to update vs create or delete quotas). No exclusions or alternative references are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.