LimeSurvey MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to LimeSurvey MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA simple server that enables management of LimeSurvey surveys and responses through MCP client integration.355Apache 2.0
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables interaction with LimeSurvey API to create and manage surveys, questions, question groups, activate surveys, and export responses through standardized MCP endpoints.-
- AlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceMCP server providing full access to Kiwi TCMS via JSON-RPC, with 68 tools for test plans, cases, runs, executions, and reference data. It supports named arguments, default project, and easy integration with MCP clients.6819 npmMIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceComprehensive MCP server for the Mautic marketing automation API, providing 203 tools for managing contacts, campaigns, emails, segments, and more.2-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides 36 tools for interacting with the amoCRM (Kommo) API v4, covering leads, contacts, companies, and tasks. It supports full entity lifecycles, account analytics, and bulk operations with integrated OAuth 2.0 and rate limiting.2MIT

mspbots-forms-mcpofficial
FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for the MSPbots Forms/Survey API, enabling agents to create, publish, and manage surveys, share links, and analyze responses.-
TDQS
Scored across 71 tools
Many tools have overlapping purposes (e.g., multiple add/list/export for participants and responses). limesurvey_add_participants vs limesurvey_add_participant, and several export_responses variants are easily confused even with descriptions.
Most tools follow a consistent limesurvey_verb_noun pattern. Minor deviations like limesurvey_cpd_importParticipants (mixed case) and find_surveys vs list_surveys reduce consistency slightly.
71 tools is far beyond the typical 3-15 range. Even for a comprehensive survey system, this volume is excessive and will overwhelm agents, causing selection difficulty.
Covers survey, group, question, participant, response, quota, theme, and settings lifecycle thoroughly. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no update for some objects via dedicated tools, but set_properties covers many) and some tools are experimental or hacky.