androidapi_stop_sms_campaign
Stop a running SMS campaign by providing its campaign ID to halt message delivery.
Instructions
Pause a running SMS campaign.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| campaign | Yes | Campaign ID. |
Stop a running SMS campaign by providing its campaign ID to halt message delivery.
Pause a running SMS campaign.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| campaign | Yes | Campaign ID. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Beyond the annotations (which indicate this is not read-only and not destructive), the description adds no behavioral details such as whether pausing is reversible, side effects, or required permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is concise with one clear sentence, but it could be slightly expanded without sacrificing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate but lacks context about what happens after pausing or any limitations.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter 'campaign' is fully described in the schema ('Campaign ID.'), and the description does not add further meaning, resulting in a baseline score.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action ('Pause') and the resource ('a running SMS campaign'), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'androidapi_start_sms_campaign' and 'androidapi_delete_sms_campaign'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., stop vs. delete), nor any prerequisites or context for invocation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TecniForge/androidapi-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server