androidapi_delete_notification
Delete an Android notification record by specifying its ID.
Instructions
Delete an Android notification record by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Notification ID. |
Delete an Android notification record by specifying its ID.
Delete an Android notification record by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Notification ID. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and idempotentHint=true. The description adds no further behavioral context beyond 'delete', which aligns with annotations. No contradiction.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with essential info, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description is fairly complete. Missing info on error handling (e.g., ID not found) but acceptable.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 100% schema description coverage, the baseline is 3. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema's 'Notification ID' for the 'id' parameter.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Delete an Android notification record by ID' with a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes it from sibling delete tools for other entities.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., other delete tools or unsubscribing). The description lacks context for proper selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TecniForge/androidapi-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server