androidapi_delete_wa_sent
Delete a sent WhatsApp chat record using its ID.
Instructions
Delete a sent WhatsApp chat record.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Delete a sent WhatsApp chat record using its ID.
Delete a sent WhatsApp chat record.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate the tool is destructive and idempotent. The description adds no further behavioral details, such as whether deletion is permanent, or what happens if the record doesn't exist. It merely restates the action implied by the name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very concise (one sentence), which is positive, but it is too brief and omits important context. It is not structured with any additional details that would aid understanding.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite the presence of annotations, the description lacks completeness. It does not explain the return value, error cases, or prerequisites (e.g., does the record need to exist?). With no output schema, more context is needed.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter 'id' is a number with no description. The tool description does not clarify what this ID represents (e.g., internal ID, WhatsApp message ID). With 0% schema coverage, the description fails to add meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Delete' and the resource 'a sent WhatsApp chat record', which is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like delete_contact or delete_sms_sent.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to delete a specific sent message versus other types of records. The description does not mention exclusions or prerequisites.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TecniForge/androidapi-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server