androidapi_delete_contact
Delete a contact permanently from your Android device by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Permanently delete a contact by its ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Contact ID to delete. |
Delete a contact permanently from your Android device by providing its unique ID.
Permanently delete a contact by its ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Contact ID to delete. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already provide destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false, and idempotentHint=true. The description adds the word 'permanently', which reinforces the destructive nature but does not disclose any additional behavioral traits beyond what annotations convey.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient, conveying all essential information without redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete operation with one parameter, adequate annotations, and no output schema, the description sufficiently covers the action, resource, and permanence. It is complete for its complexity level.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 100% description coverage for the 'id' parameter, already stating 'Contact ID to delete.' The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond referencing the ID, so it does not improve upon the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Permanently delete a contact by its ID' clearly states the action (delete), resource (contact), and method (by ID). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like androidapi_create_contact and androidapi_get_contacts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when not to delete a contact or prerequisites. The description lacks context about when deletion is appropriate compared to other operations.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TecniForge/androidapi-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server