androidapi_get_wa_message
Retrieve a specific WhatsApp message by providing its ID and type (sent or received).
Instructions
Retrieve a single WhatsApp message by its ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| type | Yes |
Retrieve a specific WhatsApp message by providing its ID and type (sent or received).
Retrieve a single WhatsApp message by its ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| type | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, indicating a safe, non-destructive read operation. Description adds no further behavioral context, but does not contradict.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no waste. However, it could be expanded to include essential parameter hints without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Lacks explanation of return format (no output schema) and parameter semantics. For a simple retrieval, the description is insufficient for an agent to form correct requests.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Description does not explain the meaning of 'id' (e.g., message ID) or 'type' (sent/received) beyond the schema's enum. With 0% schema coverage, this omission leaves the agent without critical usage context.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (retrieve) and resource (single WhatsApp message by ID), distinguishing it from sibling tools that retrieve lists or create/delete.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'androidapi_get_wa_received' or 'androidapi_get_wa_sent' which might retrieve lists. No exclusions or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TecniForge/androidapi-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server