androidapi_delete_sms_received
Delete a received SMS message record from your Android device by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Delete a received SMS message record.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Delete a received SMS message record from your Android device by providing its unique ID.
Delete a received SMS message record.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description simply says 'delete', which aligns with annotations (destructiveHint=true). However, it adds no additional behavioral details such as irreversibility, permission requirements, or side effects beyond what the annotations already convey.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, clear sentence with no unnecessary words. Every part is relevant and front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate but fails to explain the parameter's meaning. Annotations cover the safety profile, but the lack of parameter semantics leaves the agent guessing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The only parameter 'id' has no explanation in the description. With 0% schema description coverage, the description should clarify what 'id' refers to (e.g., SMS message ID, database record ID) but does not.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('delete') and the resource ('received SMS message record'), which is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like delete_sms_sent or delete_contacts.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool, prerequisites, or alternatives. The description lacks any context about when deletion is appropriate or what conditions must be met.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TecniForge/androidapi-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server