twprojects-update_jobrole

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description only states 'Update job role,' implying mutation. Without annotations (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint), the description does not disclose behavioral traits such as idempotency, authorization requirements, or side effects. It adds minimal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (three words) and front-loaded. It is efficient but may be too minimal; however, it contains no wasted words. A slightly longer description could add value without sacrificing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simple two-parameter schema and no output schema, the description is adequate but has gaps. It does not mention return values, success/failure behavior, or effects on related data. For a simple update tool, it is minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both parameters have descriptions. The tool description does not add any information beyond the schema; it simply states the tool's purpose. Per guidelines, high schema coverage sets a baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Update job role' clearly identifies the verb and resource. It is specific enough to indicate the tool's purpose, though it does not differentiate from other update tools for different entities. The schema further clarifies the fields, so overall purpose is clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_jobrole or other update tools. No prerequisites or context are provided, leaving the agent to infer usage from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.