twdesk-create_company

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations beyond title, the description must disclose behavioral aspects. It only indicates creation (mutation) but omits any details about side effects, permission requirements, or consequences. The description adds minimal value beyond the obvious.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short (two words), but this brevity comes at the cost of usefulness. It lacks front-loaded essential information and does not earn its place by providing clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 9 parameters all required, no output schema, and a broad set of sibling tools, the description is severely incomplete. It fails to explain what a 'Desk company' is, which fields are critical, or what the tool returns.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with all parameters having descriptions, so the schema already documents parameter meanings. The description does not reiterate or supplement this information, but it does not need to given full schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create Desk company.' states the action and resource, but does not clarify that this is specific to the Desk app versus other apps like Projects. The title 'Create Company' is generic, and the description does not differentiate from siblings like twprojects-create_company.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as twdesk-update_company or twprojects-create_company. The agent is given no context about prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.