Skip to main content
Glama
QuickBooks Online MCP Server

QuickBooks Online MCP Server

by NightSquawk

create_bill_payment

Create a bill payment in QuickBooks Online to record vendor payments and keep accounts payable up to date.

Instructions

Create a bill payment in QuickBooks Online.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "params": "<params>"
    },
    "name": "create_bill_payment"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
paramsYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

C2.1/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden and discloses nothing about side effects. It does not say whether the linked bill balance changes, whether the payment is posted to an account, or what happens on failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short sentence with no wasted words, but the brevity comes from under-specification rather than economy. There is no front-loaded routing hint or structural breakdown of the payload.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations, no output schema, and an opaque nested parameter, the description leaves an agent unable to construct a valid call. Almost every fact needed to invoke this tool correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter is an undefined nested object with 0% schema description coverage, and the description adds no field-level meaning at all. An agent has no way to learn that billPayment requires a vendor reference, total amount, and payment lines.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource (create a bill payment) but simply restates the tool name. It does not distinguish this from nearby siblings such as create_payment or create-bill, which an agent will plausibly confuse with it.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this rather than create_payment (a payment against an invoice) or create-bill (recording the bill itself). No prerequisites are mentioned, such as needing an existing vendor bill to apply the payment to.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools