listLeadPonds
List all lead ponds for your team to organize and view lead sources in Lofty CRM.
Instructions
List all lead ponds for the team.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all lead ponds for your team to organize and view lead sources in Lofty CRM.
List all lead ponds for the team.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Without annotations, the description implies a read-only listing operation but does not explicitly state safety, permissions, or side effects. It is adequate but could benefit from more transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single efficient sentence with no wasted words, perfectly balancing brevity and clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple list tool with no parameters, the description is largely complete. However, it misses an opportunity to differentiate from the closely related sibling 'getLeadPond'.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has no parameters and 100% coverage, so the description does not need to add parameter info. Baseline score of 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'list' and the resource 'lead ponds' with scope 'for the team', making it easily distinguishable from the sibling tool 'getLeadPond' which returns a single pond.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'getLeadPond'. The description lacks any context about when not to use it or which scenarios are appropriate.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NerdSnipe-Inc/lofty-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server