getMemberByAccount
Retrieve a member's details using their email address.
Instructions
Get a member by their account (email address).
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account | Yes | The member email address. |
Retrieve a member's details using their email address.
Get a member by their account (email address).
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| account | Yes | The member email address. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It implies a read operation but does not disclose potential side effects, permissions needed, or behavior when the account is not found.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that directly conveys the tool's purpose without any unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get tool with no output schema, the description is adequate but lacks details about the returned member object or error handling. It would benefit from mentioning what fields or data are retrieved.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 100% description coverage for the single parameter 'account'. The description reiterates 'email address', adding minimal extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (get) and resource (member) with the identifier (account/email address). It distinguishes from sibling tool 'getMemberById' by specifying the lookup method.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit instructions on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'getMemberById'. The description does not provide context or conditions for usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NerdSnipe-Inc/lofty-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server