assignLead
Assign a lead to a user in Lofty CRM by providing the lead ID and user ID.
Instructions
Assign a lead to a user.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| leadId | Yes | Lead ID | |
| userId | Yes | User ID to assign the lead to |
Assign a lead to a user in Lofty CRM by providing the lead ID and user ID.
Assign a lead to a user.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| leadId | Yes | Lead ID | |
| userId | Yes | User ID to assign the lead to |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, and the description fails to disclose effects like replacing existing assignments, permissions required, or side effects such as notifications. The tool's behavior is opaque beyond the basic action.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence that efficiently conveys the core action. It is not verbose, but could be slightly expanded without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks context on return value or confirmation of assignment, and does not address edge cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema provides basic descriptions for both parameters, covering 100% of parameters. The tool description adds no additional meaning, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'assign' and the objects 'lead' and 'user', making the purpose plain. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'updateLead' which might also imply assignment, leaving some ambiguity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'updateLead' or 'addWorkingLeads'. The description lacks prerequisites or conditions for usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NerdSnipe-Inc/lofty-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server