getMemberById
Retrieve a member's details using their numeric user ID.
Instructions
Get a member/user by their numeric user ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | The user ID. |
Retrieve a member's details using their numeric user ID.
Get a member/user by their numeric user ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| userId | Yes | The user ID. |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states the basic function, omitting behavioral traits like read-only nature, rate limits, or authentication requirements. Minimal transparency beyond purpose.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
A single concise sentence with no wasted words. However, it could be slightly more structured by including key details in an efficient manner.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple tool (one required parameter, no output schema), the description is minimally complete. It explains what it does but lacks information about return values or behavior, which would be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (one parameter with a description). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('member/user'), and the method ('by numeric user ID'). It effectively distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'getMemberByAccount' and 'listMembers'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as 'getMemberByAccount' or 'listMembers'. No context on prerequisites or scenarios is given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NerdSnipe-Inc/lofty-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server