getCallRecordUrl
Retrieve the recording URL for a specific call using its call ID.
Instructions
Get the recording URL for a call by call ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| callId | Yes | ID of the call |
Retrieve the recording URL for a specific call using its call ID.
Get the recording URL for a call by call ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| callId | Yes | ID of the call |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description does not disclose behavioral traits such as whether the tool is read-only, what happens if no recording exists, or any permission requirements. A simple 'get' implies read operation, but no explicit assurance.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words. Front-loaded with action and resource. Efficient.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, description should specify return value (e.g., that it returns a URL) or mention potential errors. Currently lacks this context, leaving agent uncertain about tool's output.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, with callId described as 'ID of the call'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema. Baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly specifies verb 'Get', resource 'recording URL', and scope 'by call ID'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like getCallRecord (which returns call record data) and getCallByCommId (which uses a different identifier).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implicitly indicates usage when a call ID is available and a recording URL is needed. However, no explicit guidance on when not to use or when to prefer sibling tools like getCallRecord. Lacks exclusion criteria.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/NerdSnipe-Inc/lofty-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server