unfreeze_token

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description highlights irreversibility, which is a critical behavioral trait. However, with no annotations provided, the description should disclose more details such as permission requirements, side effects, or state changes beyond the single mention of irreversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise: two sentences with no superfluous words. Every sentence adds value (action and key warning).

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity (one parameter, no output schema, no annotations), the description is largely adequate. It covers the core action and a critical warning. However, it could mention that the token must be in a frozen state.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with the parameter 'token' described as 'Token address'. The description adds the context of 'frozen token' but does not add new semantic meaning beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action (open) and resource (frozen token to public trading). The word 'unfreeze' in the name is reinforced. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from the sibling 'pm_disable_freeze', which might serve a similar purpose in a different context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'pm_disable_freeze'. No prerequisites or conditions (e.g., token must be frozen) are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.