pm_can_user_buy
Check if you are allowed to buy in a private market. Enter the market name to see your eligibility.
Instructions
Check if you can buy on private market.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| market | Yes |
Check if you are allowed to buy in a private market. Enter the market name to see your eligibility.
Check if you can buy on private market.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| market | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description doesn't disclose that this is likely a read-only check, nor what criteria determine eligibility. Minimal behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single short sentence, no unnecessary words. Front-loaded but may be too terse for full clarity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Though simple, the description lacks important details like return value type (boolean), what conditions affect the check, and any prerequisites. Not complete for effective use.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%. Description does not explain the 'market' parameter's meaning, format, or restrictions beyond being required.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool checks eligibility to buy on the private market, distinguishing it from other pm_* buy tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like pm_buy or other checks. Lacks context about it being a precondition check.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Launch-On-Basis/MCP-TS'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server