set_agent_uri
Update an agent's metadata URI on the Basis protocol by providing the agent ID and new URI.
Instructions
Update your agent's metadata URI.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent_id | Yes | ||
| uri | Yes |
Update an agent's metadata URI on the Basis protocol by providing the agent ID and new URI.
Update your agent's metadata URI.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| agent_id | Yes | ||
| uri | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only says 'Update' without disclosing side effects, permissions, or what happens to the previous URI. The mutation nature is implied but not elaborated.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence), which is concise, but it sacrifices essential details. It is not well-structured for an agent to quickly grasp all necessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no annotations and no output schema, the description fails to cover return value, side effects, or prerequisites. It is incomplete for a mutation tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, yet the description adds no meaning beyond parameter names. It does not explain what 'agent_id' refers to or the format of 'uri'.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Update') and a clear resource ('your agent's metadata URI'), effectively distinguishing it from siblings like 'register_agent' (create) and 'get_agent_uri' (read).
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites (e.g., agent must exist), and no mention of checking current URI via 'get_agent_uri' first.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Launch-On-Basis/MCP-TS'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server