get_surge_tax
Retrieve the current surge tax for a token on the Basis protocol to assess trading fees.
Instructions
Get current surge tax for a token.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| token | Yes |
Retrieve the current surge tax for a token on the Basis protocol to assess trading fees.
Get current surge tax for a token.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| token | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden. It only states it 'gets' data (read), but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as required permissions, rate limits, or behavior for invalid tokens.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, which is concise, but it may be too sparse; it does not fully earn its place given the lack of detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the large number of sibling tools and the absence of an output schema, the description should provide more context (e.g., return value format). It is incomplete for an agent to reliably use it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The schema has 0% description coverage for the parameter 'token'. The description does not explain what 'token' refers to (e.g., address, symbol), leaving the agent with no additional semantic meaning beyond the raw type.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (get), resource (surge tax), and scope (for a token). This differentiates it from sibling tools like get_base_tax_rates or get_tax_rate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_tax_rate, or any prerequisites. The description merely states what it does without context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Launch-On-Basis/MCP-TS'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server