get_my_referrals
Access your referral data from the Basis protocol on BNB Smart Chain.
Instructions
Get your referral data.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Access your referral data from the Basis protocol on BNB Smart Chain.
Get your referral data.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as authentication requirements, rate limits, or data freshness. The agent has no insight into side effects or prerequisites.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, concise and to the point, with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple retrieval tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate. However, it lacks context about what specific data constitutes 'referral data' (e.g., count, link, history).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has zero parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no parameter semantics, but with no parameters, the baseline is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'referral data', indicating it retrieves the user's own referral data. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'get_public_profile_referrals', which likely returns public referral data for others.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. Given the presence of 'get_public_profile_referrals', a note on the distinction would be helpful.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Launch-On-Basis/MCP-TS'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server