get_my_profile
Retrieve your Basis profile including account tier, rank, and current streak.
Instructions
Your profile — tier, rank, streak.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve your Basis profile including account tier, rank, and current streak.
Your profile — tier, rank, streak.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. The description does not explicitly state that this tool is read-only or has no side effects. It only describes the output, leaving the agent to infer behavior from the tool name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise: one sentence listing the key output attributes. No wasted words; front-loaded with purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is adequate for a parameterless tool, but it lacks detail on the full response format or any potential error conditions. Given no output schema, more context about the return value could be helpful.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so schema coverage is 100%. The description adds value by indicating the specific output fields (tier, rank, streak), which is meaningful beyond the empty schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool returns the user's profile, specifically tier, rank, and streak. It is a specific verb (get) and resource (profile), and distinguishes from siblings like get_public_profile by focusing on the user's own profile.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like get_public_profile. The description does not provide any context for usage.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Launch-On-Basis/MCP-TS'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server