Skip to main content
Glama
Inferensys

Apollo.io MCP Server

by Inferensys

update_task

Update existing tasks in Apollo.io by changing notes, priority, due date, or marking as completed.

Instructions

Update an existing task. FREE. Can mark as completed. Undocumented endpoint.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
task_idYesApollo task ID
noteNoUpdated task note
completedNoMark as completed
priorityNo
due_atNo
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It indicates 'Undocumented endpoint' warns about reliability, but does not describe side effects, permissions, or required auth. The 'Can mark as completed' is vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short but not well-structured as sentence fragments. It front-loads the main action but misses opportunity for clarity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain optional parameters, expected formats (e.g., due_at), or the response after update.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 60%, but the description adds minimal meaning. It mentions 'completed' which is already documented. Parameters 'priority' and 'due_at' are not explained beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update an existing task' which identifies the action and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like 'create_task' or 'get_task'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions 'FREE' and 'Undocumented endpoint' indicating usage conditions but gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'create_task' or 'update_account'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Inferensys/apollo-io-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server