Apollo.io MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Apollo.io MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with Apollo.io data, allowing for people and organization enrichment, search capabilities, and job posting retrieval through natural language commands.730 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with Apollo.io data, performing operations like people/organization enrichment, searching, and retrieving job postings through natural language commands.730 npm40MIT

Apollo.io MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceApollo.io MCP server for prospecting, lead enrichment, sales intelligence, and outreach workflows. Integrates Apollo.io go-to-market data into MCP-compatible AI applications.20MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for the Apollo.io API that lets LLMs search and enrich people and company data.45 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP server for Apollo.io B2B database enabling people and company search, enrichment, and insights through conversational interfaces.9451 npm19MIT
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Apollo.io B2B sales intelligence API. Enables searching and enriching people and organizations via natural language.78 npm4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 50 tools
Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with only minor overlaps like search_contacts (saved contacts) vs. search_people (prospecting database) and list_custom_fields_deprecated vs. list_fields. Descriptions effectively resolve ambiguity.
All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lowercase with underscores (e.g., create_contact, search_people). No mixed conventions or confusing name styles.
With 50 tools, the server is significantly oversized compared to typical MCP servers (3-15). While each tool serves a specific function, the sheer number makes it heavy for an agent to navigate, and many tools (e.g., search_phone_calls, search_activities) add complexity.
The tool surface covers most CRM and enrichment operations comprehensively (CRUD for contacts, opportunities, tasks, notes, labels; enrichment; search; sequences). Minor gaps exist: missing delete_account and delete_opportunity, and no get_sequence by ID, but these are not critical.