Skip to main content
Glama
Inferensys

Apollo.io MCP Server

by Inferensys

Related Servers

Alternatives to Apollo.io MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with Apollo.io data, allowing for people and organization enrichment, search capabilities, and job posting retrieval through natural language commands.
      7
      30 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to interact with Apollo.io data, performing operations like people/organization enrichment, searching, and retrieving job postings through natural language commands.
      7
      30 npm
      40
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Apollo.io MCP server for prospecting, lead enrichment, sales intelligence, and outreach workflows. Integrates Apollo.io go-to-market data into MCP-compatible AI applications.
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for the Apollo.io API that lets LLMs search and enrich people and company data.
      45 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server for Apollo.io B2B database enabling people and company search, enrichment, and insights through conversational interfaces.
      9
      451 npm
      19
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      MCP server for Apollo.io B2B sales intelligence API. Enables searching and enriching people and organizations via natural language.
      7
      8 npm
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 50 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with only minor overlaps like search_contacts (saved contacts) vs. search_people (prospecting database) and list_custom_fields_deprecated vs. list_fields. Descriptions effectively resolve ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in lowercase with underscores (e.g., create_contact, search_people). No mixed conventions or confusing name styles.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 50 tools, the server is significantly oversized compared to typical MCP servers (3-15). While each tool serves a specific function, the sheer number makes it heavy for an agent to navigate, and many tools (e.g., search_phone_calls, search_activities) add complexity.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers most CRM and enrichment operations comprehensively (CRUD for contacts, opportunities, tasks, notes, labels; enrichment; search; sequences). Minor gaps exist: missing delete_account and delete_opportunity, and no get_sequence by ID, but these are not critical.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues