Skip to main content
Glama

plan_multimodal_retrieval

Read-only

Plan a multimodal retrieval rollout for visual and document artifacts, configuring goal, evidence types, corpus size, embedding dimensions, latency budget, and reranker usage to avoid GPU training.

Instructions

Plan a high-ROI multimodal retrieval rollout for screenshots, PDF pages, dashboard captures, and proof artifacts without starting GPU training.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
goalNoBusiness or workflow objective for visual/document retrieval.
evidenceTypesNoEvidence surfaces to include, such as screenshots, pdf_pages, proof_artifacts, dashboards, or videos.
corpusItemsNoEstimated number of visual artifacts or document pages to index.
maxEmbeddingDimNoMaximum embedding dimension to budget for Matryoshka-style truncation planning.
latencyBudgetMsNoTarget retrieval latency budget for agent recall.
useRerankerNoWhether to include a multimodal reranker stage after initial embedding retrieval.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

ReadOnlyHint annotation already signals no side effects; description adds specificity that no GPU training starts, reinforcing read-only behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, front-loaded sentence with no filler words, directly communicates the tool's purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Accurately describes the tool's function for a planning scenario with 6 optional parameters; lacks return value specification but no output schema exists.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no extra parameter-level details beyond the schema's examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool plans a multimodal retrieval rollout for specific artifact types, distinguishing it from sibling planning tools for other domains.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use when planning retrieval but does not specify when to avoid it or compare with alternatives like plan_intent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/IgorGanapolsky/ThumbGate'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server