construct_context_pack

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description 'Construct a bounded context pack' does not expand on the destructiveHint annotation. It neither confirms nor clarifies the destructive nature, missing an opportunity to explain potential side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, achieving brevity. However, it could include structured details (e.g., parameter hints) without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 4 parameters, a destructive annotation, and no output schema, the description fails to cover return values, parameter roles, or behavioral context, leaving major gaps for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 4 parameters with 0% description coverage, and the description provides no information about any parameters. The agent receives no guidance on how to fill 'query', 'maxItems', 'maxChars', or 'namespaces'.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'construct' and the resource 'bounded context pack from contextfs'. It provides a specific verb and resource, but does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'evaluate_context_pack'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites or conditions for use, leaving the agent to infer appropriate context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.