Skip to main content
Glama

watch_mailbox

Monitor Gmail mailbox for new emails or changes by setting up real-time notifications through Cloud Pub/Sub topics, with optional label filtering.

Instructions

Watch for changes to the user's mailbox

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
topicNameYesThe name of the Cloud Pub/Sub topic to publish notifications to
labelIdsNoLabel IDs to restrict notifications to
labelFilterActionNoWhether to include or exclude the specified labels

Implementation Reference

  • src/index.ts:1281-1294 (registration)
    Registration of the 'watch_mailbox' tool with input schema using Zod and handler function that uses the shared handleTool to call Gmail API's users.watch method for watching mailbox changes.
    server.tool("watch_mailbox",
      "Watch for changes to the user's mailbox",
      {
        topicName: z.string().describe("The name of the Cloud Pub/Sub topic to publish notifications to"),
        labelIds: z.array(z.string()).optional().describe("Label IDs to restrict notifications to"),
        labelFilterAction: z.enum(['include', 'exclude']).optional().describe("Whether to include or exclude the specified labels")
      },
      async (params) => {
        return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
          const { data } = await gmail.users.watch({ userId: 'me', requestBody: params })
          return formatResponse(data)
        })
      }
    )
  • Input schema for the 'watch_mailbox' tool defining parameters for Pub/Sub topic and label filtering.
    {
      topicName: z.string().describe("The name of the Cloud Pub/Sub topic to publish notifications to"),
      labelIds: z.array(z.string()).optional().describe("Label IDs to restrict notifications to"),
      labelFilterAction: z.enum(['include', 'exclude']).optional().describe("Whether to include or exclude the specified labels")
    },
  • Handler function for 'watch_mailbox' tool that invokes the Gmail API watch endpoint via the shared handleTool utility.
    async (params) => {
      return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
        const { data } = await gmail.users.watch({ userId: 'me', requestBody: params })
        return formatResponse(data)
      })
    }
  • Shared helper function used by all Gmail tools, including 'watch_mailbox', to handle OAuth2 authentication, client creation, and API call execution.
    const handleTool = async (queryConfig: Record<string, any> | undefined, apiCall: (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => Promise<any>) => {
      try {
        const oauth2Client = queryConfig ? createOAuth2Client(queryConfig) : defaultOAuth2Client
        if (!oauth2Client) throw new Error('OAuth2 client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const credentialsAreValid = await validateCredentials(oauth2Client)
        if (!credentialsAreValid) throw new Error('OAuth2 credentials are invalid, please re-authenticate')
    
        const gmailClient = queryConfig ? google.gmail({ version: 'v1', auth: oauth2Client }) : defaultGmailClient
        if (!gmailClient) throw new Error('Gmail client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const result = await apiCall(gmailClient)
        return result
      } catch (error: any) {
        return `Tool execution failed: ${error.message}`
      }
    }

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.0.0
    • addedInput schema / $schema
      Added value: +"http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#"
    • addedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Added value: +false
  2. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It only states 'Watch for changes' without disclosing side effects (e.g., creating a subscription), permissions required, rate limits, or how to stop the watch. The behavioral impact is vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence with no wasted words. However, it is so concise that it omits important context, making it slightly less effective than a well-balanced description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 3 parameters (including an enum) and no output schema, the description is insufficient. It does not explain the watch mechanism, return behavior, or relationship to sibling 'stop_mail_watch'. More detail is needed for effective use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with clear descriptions for each parameter. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, meeting the baseline of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Watch for changes to the user's mailbox' clearly identifies the verb (Watch) and resource (mailbox), distinguishing it from most sibling tools. However, it does not explicitly indicate that this tool starts a watch, which could be inferred from the sibling 'stop_mail_watch'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'stop_mail_watch' or other mailbox-related tools. The description lacks context about prerequisites, setup, or lifecycle.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.