Skip to main content
Glama

update_vacation

Configure Gmail vacation responder settings to automatically reply to emails during absences, including custom messages, timing, and recipient restrictions.

Instructions

Update vacation responder settings

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
enableAutoReplyYesWhether the vacation responder is enabled
responseSubjectNoOptional subject line for the vacation responder auto-reply
responseBodyPlainTextYesResponse body in plain text format
restrictToContactsNoWhether responses are only sent to contacts
restrictToDomainNoWhether responses are only sent to users in the same domain
startTimeNoStart time for sending auto-replies (epoch ms)
endTimeNoEnd time for sending auto-replies (epoch ms)

Implementation Reference

  • src/index.ts:910-927 (registration)
    Registration of the 'update_vacation' MCP tool, including input schema validation with Zod and the handler function that calls the Gmail API to update vacation responder settings via handleTool wrapper.
    server.tool("update_vacation",
      "Update vacation responder settings",
      {
        enableAutoReply: z.boolean().describe("Whether the vacation responder is enabled"),
        responseSubject: z.string().optional().describe("Optional subject line for the vacation responder auto-reply"),
        responseBodyPlainText: z.string().describe("Response body in plain text format"),
        restrictToContacts: z.boolean().optional().describe("Whether responses are only sent to contacts"),
        restrictToDomain: z.boolean().optional().describe("Whether responses are only sent to users in the same domain"),
        startTime: z.string().optional().describe("Start time for sending auto-replies (epoch ms)"),
        endTime: z.string().optional().describe("End time for sending auto-replies (epoch ms)")
      },
      async (params) => {
        return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
          const { data } = await gmail.users.settings.updateVacation({ userId: 'me', requestBody: params })
          return formatResponse(data)
        })
      }
    )
  • Shared handler logic for all Gmail API tools, including OAuth2 authentication validation and client creation before executing the provided API call. Used by update_vacation tool.
    const handleTool = async (queryConfig: Record<string, any> | undefined, apiCall: (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => Promise<any>) => {
      try {
        const oauth2Client = queryConfig ? createOAuth2Client(queryConfig) : defaultOAuth2Client
        if (!oauth2Client) throw new Error('OAuth2 client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const credentialsAreValid = await validateCredentials(oauth2Client)
        if (!credentialsAreValid) throw new Error('OAuth2 credentials are invalid, please re-authenticate')
    
        const gmailClient = queryConfig ? google.gmail({ version: 'v1', auth: oauth2Client }) : defaultGmailClient
        if (!gmailClient) throw new Error('Gmail client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const result = await apiCall(gmailClient)
        return result
      } catch (error: any) {
        return `Tool execution failed: ${error.message}`
      }
    }
  • Helper function to format API responses in MCP-compatible content structure, used by update_vacation handler.
    const formatResponse = (response: any) => ({ content: [{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(response) }] })
  • Zod schema for input parameters of the update_vacation tool.
    {
      enableAutoReply: z.boolean().describe("Whether the vacation responder is enabled"),
      responseSubject: z.string().optional().describe("Optional subject line for the vacation responder auto-reply"),
      responseBodyPlainText: z.string().describe("Response body in plain text format"),
      restrictToContacts: z.boolean().optional().describe("Whether responses are only sent to contacts"),
      restrictToDomain: z.boolean().optional().describe("Whether responses are only sent to users in the same domain"),
      startTime: z.string().optional().describe("Start time for sending auto-replies (epoch ms)"),
      endTime: z.string().optional().describe("End time for sending auto-replies (epoch ms)")
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. 'Update' implies a mutation, but it doesn't disclose behavioral traits like whether changes are immediate, require specific permissions, affect existing settings not mentioned, or have side effects. The description is too minimal to inform the agent about the tool's behavior beyond the basic action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with zero waste. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded, directly stating the tool's purpose without unnecessary elaboration.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the complexity of a 7-parameter mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It lacks context on usage scenarios, behavioral details, and expected outcomes, making it insufficient for an agent to understand the full scope of the tool's operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents all 7 parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, such as explaining relationships between parameters (e.g., how enableAutoReply interacts with startTime/endTime). Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('update') and resource ('vacation responder settings'), providing a specific verb+resource combination. However, it doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_vacation' or 'update_auto_forwarding', which would require mentioning what exactly gets updated about vacation settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., needing vacation settings to exist), compare to 'get_vacation' for reading settings, or specify use cases like setting up out-of-office replies.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HitmanLy007/gmail-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server