Skip to main content
Glama

add_delegate

Grant email access to another user by adding them as a delegate to your Gmail account, enabling shared inbox management.

Instructions

Adds a delegate to the specified account

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
delegateEmailYesEmail address of delegate to add

Implementation Reference

  • src/index.ts:929-940 (registration)
    Registration of the 'add_delegate' MCP tool, including description, Zod input schema, and inline async handler function that invokes the Gmail API to add a delegate.
    server.tool("add_delegate",
      "Adds a delegate to the specified account",
      {
        delegateEmail: z.string().describe("Email address of delegate to add")
      },
      async (params) => {
        return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
          const { data } = await gmail.users.settings.delegates.create({ userId: 'me', requestBody: { delegateEmail: params.delegateEmail } })
          return formatResponse(data)
        })
      }
    )
  • The core handler function for the add_delegate tool. It uses the shared handleTool helper to manage OAuth2 authentication, create a Gmail client, call the Gmail API to create a delegate, and format the response.
    async (params) => {
      return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
        const { data } = await gmail.users.settings.delegates.create({ userId: 'me', requestBody: { delegateEmail: params.delegateEmail } })
        return formatResponse(data)
      })
    }
  • Input schema for add_delegate tool defined using Zod, requiring a delegateEmail string.
    {
      delegateEmail: z.string().describe("Email address of delegate to add")
  • Shared helper function handleTool used by add_delegate (and other tools) to handle OAuth2 client creation, credential validation, Gmail client instantiation, API call execution, and error handling.
    const handleTool = async (queryConfig: Record<string, any> | undefined, apiCall: (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => Promise<any>) => {
      try {
        const oauth2Client = queryConfig ? createOAuth2Client(queryConfig) : defaultOAuth2Client
        if (!oauth2Client) throw new Error('OAuth2 client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const credentialsAreValid = await validateCredentials(oauth2Client)
        if (!credentialsAreValid) throw new Error('OAuth2 credentials are invalid, please re-authenticate')
    
        const gmailClient = queryConfig ? google.gmail({ version: 'v1', auth: oauth2Client }) : defaultGmailClient
        if (!gmailClient) throw new Error('Gmail client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const result = await apiCall(gmailClient)
        return result
      } catch (error: any) {
        return `Tool execution failed: ${error.message}`
      }
    }
  • Helper function to format tool responses as MCP content blocks with JSON-stringified data.
    const formatResponse = (response: any) => ({ content: [{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(response) }] })
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states the tool adds a delegate, implying a write/mutation operation, but doesn't specify required permissions, whether the action is reversible, potential side effects (e.g., email access changes), or error conditions. This is a significant gap for a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that directly states the tool's function without unnecessary words. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded, making it easy to parse quickly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given this is a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It lacks details on behavioral aspects (e.g., permissions, effects), usage context, and what the tool returns, leaving significant gaps for an agent to understand and invoke it correctly in a real-world scenario.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with the single parameter 'delegateEmail' clearly documented in the schema. The description doesn't add any meaning beyond this (e.g., format constraints or validation rules), so it meets the baseline of 3 where the schema does the heavy lifting without extra value from the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Adds') and resource ('delegate to the specified account'), making the purpose understandable. However, it doesn't explicitly differentiate from its sibling 'remove_delegate' or other delegate-related tools like 'get_delegate' and 'list_delegates', which would be needed for a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., needing account permissions), when it's appropriate compared to 'remove_delegate' or other delegate tools, or any constraints on usage, leaving the agent to infer context from sibling names alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HitmanLy007/gmail-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server