Skip to main content
Glama

update_pop

Configure POP email access settings to control which messages are retrievable and what happens to them after fetching.

Instructions

Updates POP settings

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
accessWindowYesThe range of messages which are accessible via POP
dispositionYesThe action that will be executed on a message after it has been fetched via POP

Implementation Reference

  • src/index.ts:896-908 (registration)
    Registration of the MCP tool 'update_pop' including description, input schema, and handler function.
    server.tool("update_pop",
      "Updates POP settings",
      {
        accessWindow: z.enum(['disabled', 'allMail', 'fromNowOn']).describe("The range of messages which are accessible via POP"),
        disposition: z.enum(['archive', 'trash', 'leaveInInbox']).describe("The action that will be executed on a message after it has been fetched via POP")
      },
      async (params) => {
        return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
          const { data } = await gmail.users.settings.updatePop({ userId: 'me', requestBody: params })
          return formatResponse(data)
        })
      }
    )
  • The handler function executes the tool logic: authenticates via handleTool, calls Gmail API to update POP settings with provided params, formats and returns the response.
    async (params) => {
      return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
        const { data } = await gmail.users.settings.updatePop({ userId: 'me', requestBody: params })
        return formatResponse(data)
      })
    }
  • Zod schema defining input parameters for 'update_pop': accessWindow (enum) and disposition (enum).
    {
      accessWindow: z.enum(['disabled', 'allMail', 'fromNowOn']).describe("The range of messages which are accessible via POP"),
      disposition: z.enum(['archive', 'trash', 'leaveInInbox']).describe("The action that will be executed on a message after it has been fetched via POP")
    },
  • Shared helper function 'handleTool' used by 'update_pop' and other tools to handle OAuth2 authentication, Gmail client creation, and API call execution with error handling.
    const handleTool = async (queryConfig: Record<string, any> | undefined, apiCall: (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => Promise<any>) => {
      try {
        const oauth2Client = queryConfig ? createOAuth2Client(queryConfig) : defaultOAuth2Client
        if (!oauth2Client) throw new Error('OAuth2 client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const credentialsAreValid = await validateCredentials(oauth2Client)
        if (!credentialsAreValid) throw new Error('OAuth2 credentials are invalid, please re-authenticate')
    
        const gmailClient = queryConfig ? google.gmail({ version: 'v1', auth: oauth2Client }) : defaultGmailClient
        if (!gmailClient) throw new Error('Gmail client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const result = await apiCall(gmailClient)
        return result
      } catch (error: any) {
        return `Tool execution failed: ${error.message}`
      }
    }
  • Shared helper 'formatResponse' used to format API responses into MCP content structure.
    const formatResponse = (response: any) => ({ content: [{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(response) }] })
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. 'Updates POP settings' implies a mutation operation but doesn't disclose permissions required, whether changes are reversible, side effects, rate limits, or what happens to existing settings not mentioned. This is inadequate for a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise at just three words, with zero wasted language. It's front-loaded with the core action and resource. Every word earns its place in this minimal description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is insufficiently complete. It doesn't explain what POP settings are, what the update operation entails, what permissions are required, or what the response looks like. The 100% schema coverage helps with parameters but doesn't compensate for the lack of behavioral context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with both parameters having clear enum descriptions. The description adds no additional parameter information beyond what's already in the schema. According to scoring rules, when schema coverage is high (>80%), the baseline is 3 even with no param info in the description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Updates POP settings' clearly states the action (updates) and resource (POP settings), making the purpose understandable. However, it lacks specificity about what POP settings are being updated and doesn't differentiate from sibling tools like 'update_imap' or 'update_auto_forwarding' that also update email protocol settings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of prerequisites, when this operation is appropriate, or what distinguishes it from similar tools like 'update_imap' or 'update_auto_forwarding' in the sibling list.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/HitmanLy007/gmail-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server