Skip to main content
Glama

longevitypulse

Interpret biomarkers, discover evidence-based supplements, build personalized longevity protocols, search clinical trials, and explore Blue Zone and country longevity data through a single API.

Instructions

LongevityPulse: Global longevity intelligence API — biomarker interpretation, supplement evidence, personalized protocols, clinical trials, Blue Zone research, WHO country longevity profiles, epigenetic clocks, dieta

Coverage: Global

Endpoints: • biomarker ($0.15): Biomarker interpretation through longevity science lens • supplement-intel ($0.20): Evidence-graded longevity supplement intelligence • protocol-builder ($0.25): Personalized longevity protocol — exercise, nutrition, sleep, supplements • clinical-trials ($0.10): Search active longevity clinical trials globally from ClinicalTrials.gov • blue-zone ($0.10): Blue Zone intelligence — world longevity hotspots deep-dive • country-longevity ($0.12): WHO country longevity profile — life expectancy, HALE, healthcare, initiatives • epigenetic-clock ($0.20): Epigenetic aging clocks — biological age science, testing, and reversal • diet-intel ($0.15): Evidence-graded dietary analysis for longevity and healthspan • longevity-drug ($0.20): Pharmaceutical longevity intelligence — rapamycin, metformin, senolytics • longevity-clinic ($0.12): Global longevity clinic guide — destinations, treatments, red flags

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
ageNoAge in years — e.g. 35 | 52 | 65
sexNoBiological sex — male | female
dietNoDiet pattern — e.g. Mediterranean | time-restricted eating | fasting mimicking diet | Blue Zone plant-based | MIND diet | caloric restriction | ketogenic | Japanese traditional
drugNoDrug name — e.g. rapamycin | metformin | acarbose | dasatinib | fisetin | senolytics | empagliflozin | semaglutide
langNoResponse language: en|es|fr|de|ja|zh|ko|pt|ar|hi (default: en)
zoneNoBlue Zone or region — e.g. Okinawa | Sardinia | Ikaria | Nicoya | Loma Linda | Blue Zones overview | Hunza | Vilcabamba
goalsNoLongevity goals — e.g. maximize healthspan | cardiovascular health | cognitive longevity | muscle preservation | reverse biological age
topicNoTopic — e.g. GrimAge | DunedinPACE | biological age overview | how to reverse biological aging | epigenetic reprogramming | how to test biological age
valueNoLab result with unit — e.g. 85 mg/dL | 2.1 mg/L | 5.4% | 420 ng/dL (optional — enables personalized assessment)
actionYesWhich endpoint to call. Options: biomarker | supplement-intel | protocol-builder | clinical-trials | blue-zone | country-longevity | epigenetic-clock | diet-intel | longevity-drug | longevity-clinic
budgetNoBudget level — low | moderate | high | $200/month
countryNoCountry name — e.g. Japan | Singapore | Spain | South Korea | Switzerland | Costa Rica | Australia | United States | India | Nigeria
compoundNoCompound name — e.g. NMN | NR | berberine | spermidine | urolithin A | fisetin | quercetin | alpha-ketoglutarate | resveratrol | taurine
biomarkerNoBiomarker name — e.g. ApoB | hs-CRP | HbA1c | testosterone | IGF-1 | homocysteine | Lp(a) | ferritin | vitamin D | DHEA-S
conditionNoCondition or intervention — e.g. aging | rapamycin | metformin | NMN | senolytics | caloric restriction | Alzheimer prevention
treatmentNoTreatment of interest — e.g. stem cell therapy | NAD+ IV | peptide therapy | hyperbaric oxygen | plasmapheresis | ozone therapy
conditionsNoHealth conditions — e.g. type 2 diabetes | hypertension | none
recruiting_onlyNoShow only recruiting trials (default: true)
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden. It discloses the endpoints and their costs, but does not mention potential side effects, authentication, or rate limits. However, it is likely a read-only data API, so the lack of destructive action warnings is acceptable.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured with a header, coverage note, and bullet-pointed endpoints. It is front-loaded with the general purpose. However, it is somewhat lengthy and could be more concise by grouping related information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers all endpoints adequately but lacks guidance on how parameters interact with specific actions. Without an output schema, it would benefit from explaining return values or result formats. Overall, it is sufficient but has gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds endpoint-level context but does not elaborate on parameter usage beyond what the schema provides. It could clarify which parameters are relevant for which actions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool as a global longevity intelligence API with specific endpoints for biomarker interpretation, supplement evidence, and more. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by its focus on longevity, which is evident from the name and content.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lists all endpoints and their purposes, making it clear when to use this tool (for longevity-related queries). While it doesn't explicitly compare to alternatives, the sibling tool names suggest different domains, so usage context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/GTCC777/mcp-pulsenetwork'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server