Skip to main content
Glama

edupulse

Generate study guides and practice quizzes for any subject and grade level worldwide, with adaptive exams and diagnostic feedback.

Instructions

EduPulse: Global education intelligence API — 10 endpoints for students, test-takers, and lifelong learners worldwide. Study guide generation (any subject, any grade level, 190+ countries), adaptive quiz with e

Coverage: Global

Endpoints: • guide ($0.10): Study guide generation — any subject, any grade, any country • quiz ($0.10): Practice quiz with adaptive difficulty and answer explanations • explain ($0.05): Concept explainer — any topic at any level from 5th grade to PhD • schedule ($0.10): Backwards-planned study schedule — from exam date to today, with daily tasks • prep ($1.00): Exam-style practice questions — 200+ exams, rubric-matched difficulty • flashcards ($0.50): Spaced-repetition flashcard set — import into Anki or Quizlet • explain ($0.50): Exam format explainer — complete breakdown of any exam structure and strategy • mock ($1.00): Full mock exam simulation — timed, scored, with performance report • misconception ($0.10): Misconception diagnosis — pinpoints the exact knowledge gap behind a wrong answer • grade ($1.00): Rubric-based exam grading — written response scoring with detailed feedback • co-op-guide ($0.10): Homeschool co-op finder • curriculum-match ($0.10): Homeschool curriculum matcher • essay ($0.25): Admissions essay review • homeschool-laws ($0.10): Homeschool law lookup

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cityNoCity
dateNoExam date YYYY-MM-DD
examNoexam
langNoResponse language code (e.g. es, fr, zh, ja)
countNocount
essayNoEssay text
focusNoFocus (academic, social, both)
gradeNoGrade level: K, 1-12
levelNoGrade level or exam type
stateNoState
styleNoLearning style (any, structured, eclectic, etc.)
topicNoSpecific topic within the subject
actionYesWhich endpoint to call. Options: guide | quiz | explain | schedule | prep | flashcards | explain | mock | misconception | grade | co-op-guide | curriculum-match | essay | homeschool-laws
answerNoThe student's wrong answer
promptNoEssay prompt
schoolNoTarget school
conceptNoconcept
sectionNoExam section (e.g. FAR for CPA)
subjectNoSubject (algebra, biology, chemistry, history, etc.)
audienceNoe.g. 'nursing student', 'Series 7 candidate', 'adult learner'
durationNoDuration in minutes
questionNoThe exam/study question
responseNoThe student response to grade
questionsNoquestions
religiousNoReligious preference (none, christian, etc.)
child_agesNoChild ages (e.g. 5-10, all ages)
difficultyNodifficulty
question_typeNoe.g. NGN, logic-games, task-based-simulation, data-sufficiency
hours_per_weekNohours_per_week
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must describe behavior. It mentions pricing per endpoint and vague capabilities (e.g., 'pinpoints knowledge gaps'), but omits critical details like whether operations are read-only, destructive, or require authorization. Behavioral traits are inadequately disclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is overly long, listing 14 endpoints with pricing. It is not front-loaded with a clear summary, and the bullet list includes redundant entries (explain appears twice). The structure is verbose without being informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (29 parameters, 14 actions), the description is grossly incomplete. It lacks guidance on required combinations, output format, usage constraints, and error scenarios. The agent would be unable to invoke the tool correctly based on this description alone.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite 100% schema description coverage, the parameter descriptions are tautological (e.g., 'count' description is 'count', 'difficulty' is 'difficulty'). The lengthy tool description fails to map parameters to specific actions, leaving the agent unable to determine which parameters to use for each endpoint.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description mentions 'Global education intelligence API' and lists 14 endpoints, but does not clearly state what the tool as a whole accomplishes. The overarching purpose is vague, and the list of endpoints reads like a catalog rather than a coherent tool definition.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus its siblings (all 'pulse' tools). The description does not provide context for appropriate usage or mention alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/GTCC777/mcp-pulsenetwork'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server