Skip to main content
Glama

arbipulse

Detects arbitrage opportunities in DeFi yield, DEX prices, perpetual funding rates, sports surebets, ETF/NAV gaps, and commodity regional pricing.

Instructions

ArbiPulse: 12 endpoints scanning arbitrage opportunities across DeFi yield spreads, DEX price differentials, perpetual funding rates, sports surebets, ETF/NAV gaps, and commodity regional pricing. Execution-tier

Coverage: Global

Endpoints: • scanner ($0.10): Unified Arbitrage Scanner • defi ($0.10): DeFi Yield Arbitrage • perps ($0.10): Perpetual Futures Funding Rate Carry • flash ($0.75): Flash Loan Strategy Builder • sports ($0.10): Sports Surebet Scanner • crypto ($0.07): CEX Spot Price Arbitrage • dex ($0.10): DEX Price Arbitrage • execute ($0.75): Execution Package Builder • calculator ($0.05): Arbitrage Profit Calculator • etf ($0.10): ETF/NAV Premium-Discount Tracker • commodity ($0.10): Commodity Regional Arbitrage • pairs ($0.15): Statistical Arbitrage (Pairs Trading)

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
daysNodays
langNoResponse language code (en | es | fr | de | zh | hi | ar | pt | ja | ko | etc.)
pairNopair
typeNotype
unitNounit
assetNoasset
chainNochain
sportNosport
tokenNotoken
actionYesWhich endpoint to call. Options: scanner | defi | perps | flash | sports | crypto | dex | execute | calculator | etf | commodity | pairs
amountNoamount
chainsNochains
regionNoregion
tickerNoticker
asset_aNoasset_a
asset_bNoasset_b
gas_usdNogas_usd
min_apyNomin_apy
regionsNoregions
arb_typeNoarb_type
categoryNocategory
platformNoplatform
protocolNoprotocol
receiverNoreceiver
strategyNostrategy
commodityNocommodity
exchangesNoexchanges
amount_usdNoamount_usd
exit_priceNoexit_price
long_venueNolong_venue
asset_classNoasset_class
entry_priceNoentry_price
short_venueNoshort_venue
slippage_bpsNoslippage_bps
flash_fee_bpsNoflash_fee_bps
lookback_daysNolookback_days
taker_fee_bpsNotaker_fee_bps
bridge_fee_usdNobridge_fee_usd
min_profit_pctNomin_profit_pct
min_profit_usdNoMinimum net profit per $1,000 stake
min_spread_bpsNomin_spread_bps
trade_size_usdNotrade_size_usd
wallet_addressNowallet_address
stablecoin_onlyNostablecoin_only
opportunity_typeNoopportunity_type
withdrawal_fee_usdNowithdrawal_fee_usd
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It does not disclose behavioral traits such as auth requirements, rate limits, or side effects. The 'Execution-tier' hint is vague about costs but insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured as a list of endpoints with prices, which is clear but verbose. It front-loads the purpose, but the endpoint list could be condensed or supplemented with usage examples.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 46 parameters and 12 endpoints without output schema or mapping from params to actions, the description is incomplete. It does not explain how to construct valid requests for specific endpoints.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Although schema coverage is 100%, most parameter descriptions are tautological (e.g., 'days', 'pair') adding no meaning. Only 'action' and 'lang' have meaningful descriptions. The tool description does not compensate by mapping parameters to endpoints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it scans arbitrage opportunities across multiple domains (DeFi, DEX, perpetuals, sports, ETF, commodities). However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like cryptopulse or alphapulse, which may also have similar structures.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no exclusions. The description only lists endpoints without context on selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/GTCC777/mcp-pulsenetwork'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server