startup_valuation__dilution

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist. The description only states 'Founder ownership after the round' without explaining what the tool does beyond that. It does not disclose behavioral traits like required inputs, return value, or assumptions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise (one short sentence) but lacks structure and essential information. Conciseness here is more about brevity than effective communication.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Missing output schema and annotations. The description does not specify what the tool returns or how the calculation works. For a simple tool, more context is needed for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% and description does not explain the three parameters (founder_pct, new_money, post_money). Parameter names provide some hint but no confirmation of their meaning or units.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Founder ownership after the round' combined with the name 'dilution' clearly indicates the tool computes post-funding founder ownership. It distinguishes from sibling startup valuation tools (Berkus, VC method) which focus on valuation methods rather than dilution.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as other startup valuation tools. No prerequisites or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.