Skip to main content
Glama

credit_analysis__net_leverage

Compute net leverage using total debt, cash, and EBITDA. Evaluate financial risk by measuring debt burden against earnings.

Instructions

[credit-analysis] net_leverage

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
cashYes
ebitdaYes
total_debtYes
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavior. It provides no information about side effects, required permissions, or return structure. The tool is a calculation, but this is not stated.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely short but fails to convey essential information. It is underspecified rather than concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with three required numeric inputs and no output schema, the description is entirely inadequate. It provides no context on the calculation, use case, or return value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters1/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%. Description does not explain any of the three parameters (total_debt, cash, ebitda). Agent cannot infer their meaning or expected units.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description '[credit-analysis] net_leverage' vaguely indicates a credit analysis tool but fails to state that it computes the net leverage ratio (Total Debt - Cash) / EBITDA. It does not differentiate from sibling tools like DSCR or interest coverage.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use or not use this tool versus alternatives. No prerequisites or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/GAJETOso/financeskills'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server