post_w_company_custom_domain

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose effects and requirements. It does not mention that this is a write operation, potential side effects, required authentication, or what happens on success/failure. It only describes request construction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short and front-loaded with the endpoint, but the information provided is minimal. It is concise but lacks substance; the structure is acceptable, but the content is insufficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description fails to explain the purpose, the shape of the body, or the expected behavior. The tool is part of a large REST API family, and this definition does not help the agent distinguish it from siblings or understand its functionality.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no meaning to the four generic parameters (body, query, headers, path_params). It tells the agent to put certain things in parameters but does not explain what each parameter expects (e.g., what fields in body, what query filters are valid).

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names the HTTP endpoint but does not state what 'custom_domain' represents or what the POST operation does to it. It is essentially a technical specification, not a functional description. The verb 'post' is implicit from the endpoint and the resource is unclear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like post_w_company_custom_profile or any other post_w_* tool. The description simply instructs where to put parameters, not when to invoke the tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.