delete_d_asset_assets_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It discloses that it calls DELETE, implying mutation, and specifies parameter routing, but doesn't mention reversibility, permissions, or side effects (e.g., cascading deletes).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief and front-loaded with the action and endpoint, then efficiently explains parameter placement in a single sentence. It's concise but lacks some important detail, so not a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, but it's not described. The description covers basic usage but misses critical details like required parameters (e.g., 'id' in path), authentication requirements, and potential error responses. For a delete operation, this is a moderate gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% (descriptions for each parameter are absent), so the description must compensate. It clarifies that path_params are for route IDs, query for filters/pagination, and headers for request headers, which adds meaning beyond the generic parameter names.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and the resource 'asset' with the HTTP method and path. It distinguishes this as a delete operation among the many asset-related sibling tools, though it doesn't explicitly name siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explains where to put parameters (path_params, query, headers) but doesn't explicitly say when to use this tool vs alternatives. The naming convention suggests deleting a specific asset by ID, but no elaboration on prerequisites (e.g., existence, state) is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.