get_r_company_app_baseline_plan_global

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'Retrieve', implying a read operation, but does not mention side effects, permissions, rate limits, response format, or limitations. A concise but insufficient disclosure for a tool with no annotation support.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence that front-loads the core action and resource. No wasted words. The parameter placement guidance is efficient and directly actionable.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with four optional, open-ended parameters, no annotations, and an output schema present, the description is too thin. It does not describe the response, available filters, pagination format, or any behavioral nuances. An agent would lack key information to use this tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It adds basic placement hints (route IDs in path_params, query for filters/pagination, headers for required headers), but these are generic and do not explain specific query parameters, filter syntax, or pagination fields. Minimal value beyond the schema's generic object types.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a clear verb (Retrieve) and a specific resource (app baseline plan global), and the 'global' qualifier helps distinguish it from the sibling 'company' and 'assets' variants. However, it does not explicitly contrast with those siblings or explain what 'global' means in this context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides guidance on where to place parameters (route IDs in path_params, filters/pagination in query, headers in headers) but gives no indication of when to use this tool vs. its siblings, nor any prerequisites or exclusions. The guidance is generic and could apply to any endpoint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.