get_r_company_agents_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the disclosure burden. It clearly indicates a read-only GET operation by using 'Retrieve' and naming the HTTP method, and it explains request construction. It does not mention auth, rate limits, error behavior, or pagination defaults, but these gaps are less critical for a simple retrieval call.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two front-loaded sentences with no filler; the first names the operation and endpoint, the second packs parameter placement instructions. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the key invocation details (endpoint, parameter placement) and an output schema exists for return-value details. However, it omits any example or enumeration of acceptable query filters and does not clarify the relationship to the list sibling, leaving minor gaps for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides only generic `additionalProperties` objects with no per-parameter meaning, so the description adds essential semantics: `path_params` hold IDs, `query` holds filters/pagination, and `headers` holds required headers. It does not mention the `body` parameter, but a GET request's body is typically unused.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific action ('Retrieve agent Calls') and the exact endpoint `GET /r/company/agents/{id}`, making the resource and ID-scoped nature clear. It does not explicitly contrast with the sibling list endpoint `get_r_company_agents`, but the `{id}` path makes the distinction obvious.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides concrete instruction on where to place route IDs, query filters/pagination, and headers. It does not, however, state when to prefer this over the non-ID sibling `get_r_company_agents` or any exclusions, leaving the choice mostly implied by the endpoint.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.