template_delete

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description merely repeats 'Delete', which is essentially a tautology. The destructiveHint annotation already signals the tool's destructive nature, and the description adds no extra behavioral information such as irreversibility, required permissions, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise (one sentence), but this conciseness comes at the cost of missing critical information. It could easily include a brief note on the parameter without losing efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter, no output schema), the description is incomplete. It omits the purpose of the required parameter and any mention of expected outcomes or errors, making it barely adequate for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description provides no explanation for the template_id parameter. With 0% schema coverage on parameters, the description must compensate but fails entirely, leaving the agent to infer the parameter's meaning from context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action (Delete) and the resource (a SignWell template). This effectively distinguishes it from sibling tools like template_create, template_get, and template_update.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any prerequisites. While the purpose is obvious, the lack of context or exclusions limits its helpfulness for an AI agent deciding between tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.