Skip to main content
Glama
Bidsketch

mcp-signwell

Official
by Bidsketch
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-signwell

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Tradovate MCP Server

      alexanimal
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables interaction with the Tradovate API for managing trading contracts, positions, orders, and accounts.
      1
      MIT
    • Apideck MCP by apideck-libraries

      Apideck MCPofficial

      apideck-libraries
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Model Context Protocol server for the Apideck Unified API. Connect any MCP-compatible agent framework to 100+ accounting systems, HRIS platforms, file storage providers, and more through one integration. More information https://www.apideck.com/mcp-server
      4
      412 npm
      20
      MIT

    • ConnectWise API Gateway MCP

      jasondsmith72
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides a comprehensive interface for interacting with the ConnectWise Manage API, simplifying API discovery, execution, and management for both developers and AI assistants.
      2 npm
      19
      -

    • Gmail MCP Server

      rigzindorje
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      This is an auto-generated Model Context Protocol server that enables interaction with Gmail API, allowing applications to access and manipulate Gmail data through structured operations defined in the OpenAPI specification.
      -
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 14 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action: document creation vs. template creation, file validation vs. file storage, etc. There is no ambiguity; even similar tools like document_send_draft and document_send_reminder have clearly different purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., document_create, template_list, file_store) using snake_case. No deviations or mixed conventions.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 14 tools, the count is well within the 3-15 ideal range. Each tool addresses a specific step in the document signing workflow without being excessive or lacking.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set covers core CRUD operations for documents and templates, file handling, validation, sending, reminders, and PDF retrieval. A minor gap is the absence of a document_delete tool, but deletion may be intentionally omitted as it's not a common part of the workflow.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessSlow

    Resources