update_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided; description only defines status values. Missing behavioral traits: whether it's idempotent, what happens if task_id is invalid, what the response contains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Very concise (two sentences) and front-loaded with action and resource. However, it could be restructured to include more critical details without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters, no param descriptions, and a complex sibling context (many CRUD tools), the description is insufficient. Output schema exists but return value is not explained.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%; description only explains status parameter enum (0=incomplete, 1=complete). No information about task_id, title, due_date, or note beyond their names and types in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (update) and resource (CRM task), and distinguishes from siblings like create_task and delete_task. However, it only mentions status update, omitting other updatable fields.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use update_task versus alternatives (e.g., create_task for new tasks, delete_task for removing). No context on prerequisites or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.