subscriptions_get_subpage_config_by_short_uuid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden, and it does almost nothing: it restates the route and controller tag. It does not state that this is a read operation, what the config contains, whether it requires protection, or what is returned. The 'Protected' tag is the only behavioral hint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The content is short and front-loaded, but the 'Tags: [Protected] Subscriptions Controller' line is metadata noise, not usable description. It is concise but partly for the wrong reason – content is missing rather than efficiently trimmed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

A tool with no annotations, no output schema, 0% schema coverage, and a required nested body object that is completely undocumented. The description provides almost none of what an agent needs to call this correctly; it is a route stub rather than a tool definition.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% and the description adds no parameter meaning whatsoever. More troubling, the schema requires a nested 'body.requestHeaders' object that the description never mentions, so an agent has no guidance on this unusual required parameter. This is the case the rules reserve low scores for.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb+resource ('Get Subpage Config by Short UUID') and the raw HTTP route, which identifies the purpose. But it says nothing about what a 'subpage config' is or how it differs from the many sibling subscription/page-config tools (subscription_page_config_get_config_by_uuid, subscriptions_get_raw_subscription_by_short_uuid, etc.). A clear purpose is stated but sibling differentiation is absent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use / when-not-to-use guidance, no prerequisites, no named alternative. The 'Protected' tag hints at auth but the description gives no condition for selecting this over the many other subscription retrieval tools. Usage must be inferred entirely from the name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.