hwid_user_devices_get_all_users

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so the description carries the full burden. It usefully discloses that filters use expensive LIKE operators and can degrade database performance, which is genuine behavioral context, and that pagination is via start/size. It omits confirmation that this is a read-only listing, auth requirements, and the shape/volume of returned data.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The functional core is front-loaded, but there is redundancy (HTTP path line plus 'Get HWID devices') and non-earning chrome such as the 'Tags: HWID User Devices Controller' line. A Russian-language pagination sentence amid otherwise English text also hurts scannability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 6 parameters (several nested), no output schema, and no annotations, the description should carry substantial weight but does not. It explains neither the return payload nor the structure of filters/sorting/filterModes/globalFilterMode, so an agent lacks the detail needed to invoke it confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 33% (size and start), yet the description merely restates that pagination uses start/size and mentions filters generically. It does not explain the nested 'filters' id/value structure, 'sorting' id/desc objects, 'filterModes', or 'globalFilterMode', leaving four complex parameters undocumented in both description and schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a verb+resource ('Get HWID devices') and echoes the endpoint 'GET /api/hwid/devices', so the core action is identifiable. However it does not reconcile itself with the tool name ('get_all_users') or distinguish this list-everything tool from siblings like hwid_user_devices_get_user_hwid_devices or hwid_user_devices_get_hwid_devices_stats. The purpose is only adequately clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an operational warning that the filters are frontend-oriented and use expensive LIKE operators, implying cautious filter use. But it offers no when-to-use vs alternative guidance against the many sibling hwid/devices and users tools. Usage is implied rather than routed.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.