subscription_page_config_get_config_by_uuid

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. Beyond the HTTP verb implying a read, it discloses nothing about auth requirements, error behavior (e.g., not-found handling), or response shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short, consisting of the raw HTTP route plus a one-line summary and a controller tag. The tag line ('Tags: Subscription Page Configs Controller') is scaffolding noise that adds no caller value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a GET tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is too thin. It doesn't mention what success looks like, error conditions, or relationship to sibling config lookups, leaving the agent with only the endpoint signature.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0%, but there is only one parameter (uuid) whose type and format are already fully specified by the schema's uuid format and pattern. The description adds no meaning beyond what the schema provides; the single-param baseline applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Get) and resource (subscription page config by uuid) with the exact REST endpoint. It is distinguishable from siblings like subscription_page_config_get_all_configs by its single-uuid scope, though it doesn't explicitly name alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this vs. get_all_configs or other lookup tools. The uuid-based phrasing implies retrieval by identifier, but there's no stated context, prerequisites, or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.